Hi,

I think it is time to run connect(2) in parallel.  This unlocks
soconnect() for udp, rip, rip6 and divert.

ok?

bluhm

Index: kern/uipc_syscalls.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c,v
diff -u -p -r1.215 uipc_syscalls.c
--- kern/uipc_syscalls.c	18 Dec 2023 13:11:20 -0000	1.215
+++ kern/uipc_syscalls.c	2 Jan 2024 11:46:55 -0000
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ sys_connect(struct proc *p, void *v, reg
 	if (KTRPOINT(p, KTR_STRUCT))
 		ktrsockaddr(p, mtod(nam, caddr_t), SCARG(uap, namelen));
 #endif
-	solock(so);
+	solock_shared(so);
 	if (isdnssocket(so)) {
 		error = dns_portcheck(p, so, mtod(nam, void *), nam->m_len);
 		if (error)
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ bad:
 	if (!interrupted)
 		so->so_state &= ~SS_ISCONNECTING;
 unlock:
-	sounlock(so);
+	sounlock_shared(so);
 	m_freem(nam);
 out:
 	FRELE(fp, p);
Index: netinet/in_pcb.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/netinet/in_pcb.h,v
diff -u -p -r1.146 in_pcb.h
--- netinet/in_pcb.h	1 Jan 2024 22:16:51 -0000	1.146
+++ netinet/in_pcb.h	2 Jan 2024 11:46:55 -0000
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
  *	y	inpt_notify		pcb table rwlock for notify
  *	p	inpcb_mtx		pcb mutex
  *	L	pf_inp_mtx		link pf to inp mutex
+ *	s	so_lock			socket rwlock
  */
 
 /*
@@ -194,7 +195,7 @@ struct inpcb {
 	void	*inp_upcall_arg;
 	u_int	inp_rtableid;		/* [t] */
 	int	inp_pipex;		/* pipex indication */
-	uint16_t inp_flowid;
+	uint16_t inp_flowid;		/* [s] */
 };
 
 LIST_HEAD(inpcbhead, inpcb);