On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:21:43AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> It has no corresponding wake(9).

OK bluhm@

Should we replace NET_UNLOCK(); tsleep_nsec(); NET_LOCK();
with rwsleep_nsec(&netlock)?

> Index: sys/net/if_wg.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_wg.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.35
> diff -u -p -r1.35 if_wg.c
> --- sys/net/if_wg.c	1 Jan 2024 18:47:02 -0000	1.35
> +++ sys/net/if_wg.c	17 Jan 2024 07:19:22 -0000
> @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ wg_peer_destroy(struct wg_peer *peer)
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  		NET_UNLOCK();
> -		tsleep_nsec(sc, PWAIT, "wg_ifq", 1000);
> +		tsleep_nsec(&nowake, PWAIT, "wg_ifq", 1000);
>  		NET_LOCK();
>  	}
>  	NET_UNLOCK();