Hello,

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 09:30:08PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 08:18:44PM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > > -		rw_enter_write(&tb->inpt_notify);
> > > -		mtx_enter(&tb->inpt_mtx);
> > > -		TAILQ_FOREACH(inp, &tb->inpt_queue, inp_queue) {
> > > -			if (inp->inp_socket->so_rcv.sb_state & SS_CANTRCVMORE)
> > > -				continue;
> > > -#ifdef INET6
> > > -			/* table is per AF, panic if it does not match */
> > > +		rw_enter_write(&table->inpt_notify);
> > > +		mtx_enter(&table->inpt_mtx);
> > > +		TAILQ_FOREACH(inp, &table->inpt_queue, inp_queue) {
> > >  			if (ip6)
> > >  				KASSERT(ISSET(inp->inp_flags, INP_IPV6));
> > >  			else
> > >  				KASSERT(!ISSET(inp->inp_flags, INP_IPV6));
> > > -#endif
> > > +
> > > +			if (inp->inp_socket->so_rcv.sb_state & SS_CANTRCVMORE)
> > > +				continue;
> >
> >     is change above intentional? the check makes sense here, I'm just asking
> >     because you have not mentioned that.
> 
> The only change is removing #ifdef and the /* table ... */ comment.
> It is just moving the KASSERT at the beginning of the loop.
> Diff's distribution of - and + makes it hard to spot.

    now I see it. sorry for extra noise. it's OK sashan.

thanks and
regards
sashan