On 23/02/24(Fri) 20:31, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Thank you for your comments on the tickless timeout roadmap.
> I have an idea of where things may get tricky, but now have
> ideas for managing it.
> 
> --
> 
> Part (1) is to extend struct intrclock with a new function, ic_send().
> ic_send() will allow arbitrary CPUs to poke the dispatch CPU for a
> given clockintr_queue to tell that CPU to reprogram its interrupt
> clock.  On the backend, ic_send() will usually be implemented with an
> IPI.

Please send a full diff that can be tested so we can give comments on
something that works.

Note that clockintr_bind(9) is still not in tree.  Please put it in.