On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 04:45:02PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Looping over all valid AID should use:
> 	for (i = AID_MIN; i < AID_MAX; i++)
> 
> Now this diff tries to enforce this everywhere and in the few cases where
> this is not the case I use:
> 	for (i = AID_UNSPEC; i < AID_MAX; i++)
> 
> For aid2afi() make sure that AID_UNSPEC returns an error and not some bad
> value.
> 
> Additionally check in some cases not only for AID_MAX but also for
> AID_MIN. E.g. when sending router-refresh messages.
> 
> Now the add-path capability uses AID_UNSPEC to indicate if it is in use
> or not. It also used this for our announce settings but that is not needed
> so only do this trick in the negotiated values.

Much better. Can't spot anything wrong with it.

ok tb