On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:26:32PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> tech@,
> 
> may I ask you to review and possible commit this trivial changes?
> 
> I have using it for last couple of days with sshfs via fuse and hasn't
> discovered any issues.

I prefer something like "Fuse file system is not truly local." as
commentary. Will commit your diff today later.

> 
> On Thu, 02 May 2024 16:28:47 +0100,
> Kirill A. Korinsky <kirill@korins.ky> wrote:
> > 
> > diff --git sys/miscfs/fuse/fuse_vfsops.c sys/miscfs/fuse/fuse_vfsops.c
> > index 5b30b1544aa..97bd929e0fd 100644
> > --- sys/miscfs/fuse/fuse_vfsops.c
> > +++ sys/miscfs/fuse/fuse_vfsops.c
> > @@ -114,7 +114,11 @@ fusefs_mount(struct mount *mp, const char *path, void *data,
> >  	fmp->allow_other = args->allow_other;
> > 
> >  	mp->mnt_data = fmp;
> > -	mp->mnt_flag |= MNT_LOCAL;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * I/O to a FUSE file system can be blocked indefinitely that makes
> > +	 * it non-local file system from kernel point of view.
> > +	 */
> > +	mp->mnt_flag &= ~MNT_LOCAL;
> >  	vfs_getnewfsid(mp);
> > 
> >  	memset(mp->mnt_stat.f_mntonname, 0, MNAMELEN);
> > 
> 
> -- 
> wbr, Kirill
>