Le 17/05/2024 à 07:20, Björn Ketelaars a écrit :
> On Tue 30/04/2024 14:50, Solene Rapenne wrote:
>> this diff adds a new check in daily(8) using rcctl ls rogue
>>
>> maybe wording could be merged better with the current text
>> to avoid repeating rc.conf.local(8) twice.
> 
> Just saw that this has been committed. Instead of replying to the commit
> message I think it makes sense to have the discussion here. Your commit
> does exactly what is intended. Point of attention is that
> 'rcctl ls rogue' does not play nicely with "meta" scripts from ports.
> There are a couple:
> 
> mail/grommunio/gromox/pkg/gromox.rc
> mail/kopano/core/pkg/kopano.rc
> net/netatalk/pkg/netatalk.rc
> net/samba/pkg/samba.rc
> sysutils/bacula/pkg/bacula.rc
> sysutils/cfengine/pkg/cfengine.rc
> sysutils/nut/pkg/nut.rc
> 
> When such a meta script is used, services started by the child scripts
> are seen as rogue. In case of net/samba:
> 
> # rcctl ls on
> samba
> # rcctl ls rogue
> nmbd
> smbd
> 
> Using samba's child scripts instead of its meta script:
> 
> # rcctl ls on
> nmbd
> smbd
> # rcctl ls rogue
> samba
> 
> The only way to get rid of this annoyance is to enable a meta script and
> its child scripts, which does not make sense.
> 
> # rcctl ls on
> nmbd
> samba
> smbd
> # rcctl ls rogue
> 
> 
> I'm not sure if there is a good solution for this: getting 'rcctl' to
> play nicely with meta scripts seems not trivial, and removing meta
> scripts will likely cause some user head scratches. Until there is a
> solution, meta script users will receive a daily report with rogue
> services.

hi, thanks for mentionning it.

It is an issue in rcctl ls rogue.

I guess a solution would be to update the rc files to list the "extra"
pid names started by the service. I saw there is already a list of special
services to not list but they are only base services that are not real
services, like multicast. There may be a way to reuse this mechanism easily.