On 2024/06/11 07:41, Alfredo Ortega wrote:
> But the fact that whole netinet/netinet6 10000+ checks were added with
> no human intervention and produced a working, arguably safer kernel,
> is surprising to me.
> Beware that at the current state, it might not be actually safer as
> the checks may actually introduce new bugs.

So, 10000+ checks, impossible to properly review, but some of which are
obviously at best useless, and even the person showing the changes warns
(correctly) that they may introduce bugs. This doesn't really seem a
good topic for tech@, perhaps misc if anywhere.