On 2024/06/11 09:28, Alfredo Ortega wrote:
> I added 10000+ checks so far, in about 4 or 5 hs. Final count will
> likely be close to a million.
> It's true that many are useless, perhaps up to 50% of them.  Most
> stack protections put into place by the compiler are also useless.
> But the question is, how many are not useless? and how many checks
> humans missed, but the AI correctly put in place?

Seems that many of the checks are adding return/continue when things
don't match conditions which aren't handled in the code. But who is to
say that's a safe thing to do in any given case? It might often be
better to let the kernel crash so the problems are more obvious.