Download raw body.
iked <> cisco, anyone seen issues with multiple childsa with one endpoint?
(I posted this elsewhere, thought I'd widen the audience a bit,
if anyone saw it there there's no additional information in this mail,
just tweaked a bit)
I'm trying to bring up a ikev2 tunnel to another organisation who are
using some Cisco device their side and having some issues when it's
configured with two child SAs -
flow esp in from AA.BB.30.128/25 to CC.DD.EE.32/28 peer YYY srcid IPV4/XXX dstid IPV4/YYY type require
flow esp in from AA.BB.31.128/25 to CC.DD.EE.32/28 peer YYY srcid IPV4/XXX dstid IPV4/YYY type require
flow esp out from CC.DD.EE.32/28 to AA.BB.30.128/25 peer YYY srcid IPV4/XXX dstid IPV4/YYY type require
flow esp out from CC.DD.EE.32/28 to AA.BB.31.128/25 peer YYY srcid IPV4/XXX dstid IPV4/YYY type require
esp tunnel from XXX to YYY spi 0x897e89d7 auth hmac-sha2-512 enc aes-256
esp tunnel from YYY to XXX spi 0xee8ff7ad auth hmac-sha2-512 enc aes-256
ikev2 "ABC" active tunnel esp \
from CC.DD.EE.32/28 to AA.BB.30.128/25 \
from CC.DD.EE.32/28 to AA.BB.31.128/25 \
local XXX peer YYY \
ikesa auth hmac-sha2-512 enc aes-256 group ecp521 \
childsa auth hmac-sha2-512 enc aes-256 group ecp521 \
srcid XXX dstid YYY \
ikelifetime 86400 \
lifetime 28800 \
psk ZZZ \
tag "ABC"
Both are showing up my side:
I don't have direct access to the other side but they're telling me
that they only see one phase2 up:
IPsec:
Tunnel ID : 87.2
Local Addr : AA.BB.31.128/255.255.255.128/0/0
Remote Addr : CC.DD.EE.32/255.255.255.240/0/0
Encryption : AES256 Hashing : SHA512
Encapsulation: Tunnel PFS Group : 21
Rekey Int (T): 28800 Seconds Rekey Left(T): 25890 Seconds
Rekey Int (D): 4608000 K-Bytes Rekey Left(D): 4607830 K-Bytes
Idle Time Out: 30 Minutes Idle TO Left : 29 Minutes
Bytes Tx : 0 Bytes Rx : 4737960
Pkts Tx : 0 Pkts Rx : 39483
and not surprisingly they reject packets sent to them for
AA.BB.30.128/25 ("The decapsulated inner packet doesn't match the
negotiated policy in the SA").
I do have tunnels up and working correctly with multiple child SAs,
but those are only iked<>iked.
Has anyone seen anything like this? Any ideas gratefully received...
iked <> cisco, anyone seen issues with multiple childsa with one endpoint?