Index | Thread | Search

From:
Omar Polo <op@omarpolo.com>
Subject:
Re: smtpd document relay ca option
To:
Jason McIntyre <jmc@kerhand.co.uk>
Cc:
tech@openbsd.org
Date:
Thu, 25 Jul 2024 19:42:38 +0200

Download raw body.

Thread
On 2024/07/25 15:01:37 +0100, Jason McIntyre <jmc@kerhand.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 01:47:31PM +0200, Philipp wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > I have noticed that the ca option for relay is not documented in the
> > action section of smtpd.conf(5). I have a patch for this.
> > 
> 
> hi.
> 
> i think it was probably felt that the scenario was already covered by
> this text:
> 
>      ca caname cert cafile
> 	     Associate the Certificate Authority (CA) certificate file cafile
> 	     with ca entry caname.  The ca entry can be referenced in listener
> 	     rules and relay actions.
> 
> however since we do list it for "listener rules" i guess we should be
> consistent either way, so i agree it makes sense to document it.
> 
> i don;t actually like the terminology "listener rules" and "relay
> action" though. the rules are "listen on" and "action ... relay".
> 
> so updated diff:
> 
> - sort your text into the correct place
> - use "listen on" and "action ... relay"
> 
> looking for smtpd dev yays or nays...

"yay" op@ :)


Thank you!

Omar Polo