Index | Thread | Search

From:
"Theo de Raadt" <deraadt@openbsd.org>
Subject:
Re: S0ix suspend
To:
Matthias Schmidt <openbsd@xosc.org>
Cc:
mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, tech@openbsd.org
Date:
Sun, 18 Aug 2024 08:18:52 -0600

Download raw body.

Thread
Matthias Schmidt <openbsd@xosc.org> wrote:

> CC Mark since he replied to the bugs@ post.
> 
> * Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > amd64 snapshots contain a 2 line diff which enable S0ix suspend by default
> > on many laptops.
> 
> Interestingly this fixes my suspend is no longer working bug that I
> reported to bugs@ two weeks ago:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=172288939202031&w=2
> 
> C3: 0 -> 0
> C6: 0 -> 0
> C7: 194813171066 -> 214805405220
> PC2: 15095949542 -> 15099261058
> PC3: 0 -> 0
> PC6: 0 -> 0
> PC7: 0 -> 0
> PC8: 0 -> 19988716324  <----
> PC9: 0 -> 0
> PC10: 0 -> 0

It did not suspend very far down, and probably still draws a lot of power.
PC10 is the goal.  Even PC9 isn't bad.

Some hardware is more complicated, weird, or just plain shittier in the
decision making department.