On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 20:50:54 +0200, Omar Polo wrote:

> > Ah, I see.  So that:
> >     return start + rec + 1;
> > 
> > is equivalent to:
> >     return rec + maxhist;
>
> yep.  actually, i think it would be easier if written like this

OK millert@

 - todd