On 2024-08-28 17:59, Chris Cappuccio wrote:

> Denis Fondras [openbsd@ledeuns.net] wrote:
>> RFC9637 published yesterday expands 2001:db8::/32 to 2001:db8::/20
>>
>> Index: examples/bgpd.conf
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/examples/bgpd.conf,v
>> diff -u -p -r1.24 bgpd.conf
>> --- examples/bgpd.conf	24 Jul 2024 19:28:37 -0000	1.24
>> +++ examples/bgpd.conf	28 Aug 2024 07:51:14 -0000
>> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ prefix-set bogons {
>>  	0100::/64 or-longer		# Discard-Only [RFC6666]
>>  	2001:2::/48 or-longer		# BMWG [RFC5180]
>>  	2001:10::/28 or-longer		# ORCHID [RFC4843]
>> -	2001:db8::/32 or-longer		# docu range [RFC3849]
>> +	2001:db8::/20 or-longer		# docu range [RFC3849] [RFC9637]
>>  	2002::/16 or-longer		# 6to4 anycast relay [RFC7526]
>>  	3ffe::/16 or-longer		# old 6bone
>>  	3fff::/20 or-longer		# docu range [draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3849-update]
> wouldn't that make it 2001:0::/20 ??

Yes it would. 2001:db8::/20 is 2001::/20, the following /20 would be
2001:1000::/20.

-- 
Åke Nordin <ake.nordin@netia.se>, resident Net/Lunix/telecom geek.
Netia Data AB, Stockholm SWEDEN *46#7O466OI99#