Hi,

On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 03:52:45PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> ...
> To avoid further confusion we prefered ccp over psp.  But now jsg@
> moved the relevant part from dev/ic/ccp.c to dev/ic/psp.c .  ccp
> (cryptographic co-processor) does not need ioctl.  Only psp (platform
> security processor) is used by /dev/ccp.  Should we call it /dev/psp?

Using /dev/psp would be fine for me.  That's actually the name, that I
used initially.  Splitting the driver as suggested by jsg@ makes sense
to me, too.  So we should go now with /dev/psp.

• smime.p7s (5K)