On Sun, Sep 08, 2024 at 11:56:44AM +0200, Christian Schulte wrote:
> On 08.09.24 11:10, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > Slightly off-topic but closely related.
> > 
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2024 at 08:55:54AM +0200, Christian Schulte wrote:
> >> Sorry, if this mail does not show up correctly in the thread. I cannot get mutt
> >> to authenticate to the gmail account. So I really used vi and sendmail -t.
> >>
> > 
> > All the messages you've been answering, in this thread as well as in the
> > other I opened recently about my mail(1) patches (allegedly sent from
> > Thunderbird since they show "User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird" among
> > their headers) lack an In-Reply-To header, hence none of them went show
> > up correctly in the thread (at least in Mutt or Tin.)  In fact this is
> > the first message of yours which includes a In-Reply-To header.  I'd
> > appreciate you tell me how you managed to include that header using a
> > "sendmail -t" command.  (Since you didn't clarify it, I assume that you
> > used OpenSMTPD.)
> > 
> > 
> 
> Does this message include a valid In-Reply-To header?

There is no In-Reply-To header in your messages sent from Thunderbird,
neither valid nor invalid.  Plus other incongruences like this:

  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


> 
> -- 
> Christian
> 
> 

-- 
Walter