Andrew Hewus Fresh <andrew@afresh1.com> wrote:

> It is useful to me, so I will keep the patch around.  I thought perhaps
> the iteration process for testing against a bsd.rd dmesg was worth the
> extra complexity, but it's not.  I'll drop it.

I do not understand the usage pattern.

On bsd.rd it is not called by that name.

On a regular install, it is not called by that name either.

It only happens if you skip "make install", and run it by a special
name.  Noone does that.