Index | Thread | Search

From:
Theo Buehler <tb@theobuehler.org>
Subject:
Re: rpki-client: remove bird1, add bird3
To:
Job Snijders <job@openbsd.org>
Cc:
tech@openbsd.org
Date:
Fri, 3 Jan 2025 11:13:15 +0100

Download raw body.

Thread
  • Theo Buehler:

    rpki-client: remove bird1, add bird3

  • Theo Buehler:

    rpki-client: remove bird1, add bird3

  • On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 02:08:01AM +0000, Job Snijders wrote:
    > On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 01:33:38AM +0000, Job Snijders wrote:
    > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 04:31:22PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
    > > > On 2024/12/19 16:31, Job Snijders wrote:
    > > > > Remove BIRD 1 output, because BIRD 1 no longer is maintained &
    > > > > supported. While there, add BIRD 3 support, which has ASPA.
    > > > 
    > > > 2.16 has ASPA too. For simplicity bird3/output_bird3 probably do
    > > > make sense, but would it be worth a quick note in the manual?
    > > > 
    > > > >  .Pa bird
    > > > >  (for bird2)
    > > > > +.Pa bird3
    > > > > +(for bird3)
    > > > 
    > > > (for bird 2.16 or newer)
    > > 
    > > Ok, let's simplify things and output just one BIRD file while
    > > documenting 2.16 or higher is required.
    > > 
    > > The below works with bird2 and bird3 in ports.
    > 
    > deraadt@ suggested to move faster. I too see benefits to focus on only
    > supporting modern versions of BIRD. -T essentially is a kludge to
    > support older versions, so let's remove it right away. With this, the
    > changes since the last portable release are:
    > 
    > * Remove bird1 output, BIRD v1 is deprecated
    > * Remove -T option which was used to customize the BIRD table names
    > * Add ASPA table to bird output, v2.16+ is required going forward
    > 
    > OK?
    
    I forgot about -A which means we still have compatibility for earlier
    bird 2 and don't unconditionally require a release that isn't even
    a month old. The other big argument in favor of this is that we don't
    need to introduce another config file which will become bothersome down
    the line.
    
    I would still prefer if we tried to remove options only after prior
    announcement in release notes, but maybe -T is specialized enough.
    There are arguments for and against making -T an error now - I think I
    can live with doing what you did.
    
    Some suggestions below. Either way
    
    ok tb
    
    > +	if (fprintf(out, "# For BIRD 2.16+\n#\n") < 0)
    
    Maybe make this 
    
    	if (fprintf(out, "# For BIRD %s+\n#\n", excludeaspa ? "2", "2.16") < 0)
    
    > +	if (fprintf(out, "\nprotocol static {\n\troa4 { table ROAS4; };\n"
    > +	    "\n") < 0)
    
    Maybe this is more readable? Dunno.
    
    	if (fprintf(out, "\nprotocol static {\n"
    	    "\troa4 { table ROAS4; };\n\n") < 0)
     
    and perhaps add something like
    
    > +Create output in the file
    >  .Pa bird
    > -(for bird2)
    > +in the output directory suitable for BIRD internet routing daemon version
    > +2.16 and up.
    
    For compatibility with earlier versions, use
    .Fl A .
    
    
    
  • Theo Buehler:

    rpki-client: remove bird1, add bird3

  • Theo Buehler:

    rpki-client: remove bird1, add bird3