> On 5 Jan 2025, at 13:49, Alexander Bluhm <bluhm@openbsd.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 12:08:15AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> Makes sense because accept(2) could be fast path. tcp_accept() is the
>> only in_setpeeraddr() which copies `inp_fport' and `inp_faddr' to passed
>> mbuf(9). Shared netlock with `so_lock' taken is pretty enough, but both
>> sockets should be locked simultaneously.
>> 
>> So yet another solock() variation. The second arg of doaccept_so*lock()
>> controls shared netlock acquisition and release. tcp(4) sockets are
>> PR_MPSOCKET sockets, so soleep_nsec() will be happy. We have some raw
>> inet6 sockets which are not PR_MPSOCKET, but they never follow this
>> path.
> 
> The inet6 sockets without PR_MPSOCKET are irrelvant.  They have no
> pr_usrreqs, socket layer is handled by rip6.  I have a diff that
> removes PR_MPSOCKET completely.
> 
>> Note, we modify `so_qlen' of listening socket but filt_soread() takes
>> only shared netlock. This should be enough because we cache `so_qlen' 
>> to local variable.
> 
> Yes, I did put a READ_ONCE(so->so_qlen) there.

It seems we could avoid socket lock at least in filt_sowrite()
and filt_soexcept(). 

> 
> OK bluhm@
> 
>> Index: sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c,v
>> diff -u -p -r1.220 uipc_syscalls.c
>> --- sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c	5 Nov 2024 09:14:19 -0000	1.220
>> +++ sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c	4 Jan 2025 20:33:31 -0000
>> @@ -247,6 +247,34 @@ sys_accept4(struct proc *p, void *v, reg
>> 	    SCARG(uap, anamelen), SCARG(uap, flags), retval));
>> }
>> 
>> +void
>> +doaccept_solock(struct socket *so, int take_netlock)
>> +{
>> +	if (take_netlock) {
>> +		switch (so->so_proto->pr_domain->dom_family) {
>> +		case PF_INET:
>> +		case PF_INET6:
>> +			NET_LOCK_SHARED();
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	rw_enter_write(&so->so_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void
>> +doaccept_sounlock(struct socket *so, int release_netlock)
>> +{
>> +	rw_exit_write(&so->so_lock);
>> +
>> +	if (release_netlock) {
>> +		switch (so->so_proto->pr_domain->dom_family) {
>> +		case PF_INET:
>> +		case PF_INET6:
>> +			NET_UNLOCK_SHARED();
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> int
>> doaccept(struct proc *p, int sock, struct sockaddr *name, socklen_t *anamelen,
>>     int flags, register_t *retval)
>> @@ -257,7 +285,7 @@ doaccept(struct proc *p, int sock, struc
>> 	socklen_t namelen;
>> 	int error, tmpfd;
>> 	struct socket *head, *so;
>> -	int cloexec, nflag, persocket;
>> +	int cloexec, nflag;
>> 
>> 	cloexec = (flags & SOCK_CLOEXEC) ? UF_EXCLOSE : 0;
>> 
>> @@ -279,9 +307,7 @@ doaccept(struct proc *p, int sock, struc
>> 	nam = m_get(M_WAIT, MT_SONAME);
>> 
>> 	head = headfp->f_data;
>> -	solock(head);
>> -
>> -	persocket = solock_persocket(head);
>> +	doaccept_solock(head, 1);
>> 
>> 	if (isdnssocket(head) || (head->so_options & SO_ACCEPTCONN) == 0) {
>> 		error = EINVAL;
>> @@ -315,8 +341,7 @@ doaccept(struct proc *p, int sock, struc
>> 	 */
>> 	so = TAILQ_FIRST(&head->so_q);
>> 
>> -	if (persocket)
>> -		solock(so);
>> +	doaccept_solock(so, 0);
>> 
>> 	if (soqremque(so, 1) == 0)
>> 		panic("accept");
>> @@ -328,8 +353,7 @@ doaccept(struct proc *p, int sock, struc
>> 	/* connection has been removed from the listen queue */
>> 	knote(&head->so_rcv.sb_klist, 0);
>> 
>> -	if (persocket)
>> -		sounlock(head);
>> +	doaccept_sounlock(head, 0);
>> 
>> 	fp->f_type = DTYPE_SOCKET;
>> 	fp->f_flag = FREAD | FWRITE | nflag;
>> @@ -338,10 +362,7 @@ doaccept(struct proc *p, int sock, struc
>> 
>> 	error = soaccept(so, nam);
>> 
>> -	if (persocket)
>> -		sounlock(so);
>> -	else
>> -		sounlock(head);
>> +	doaccept_sounlock(so, 1);
>> 
>> 	if (error)
>> 		goto out;
>> @@ -364,7 +385,7 @@ doaccept(struct proc *p, int sock, struc
>> 	return 0;
>> 
>> out_unlock:
>> -	sounlock(head);
>> +	doaccept_sounlock(head, 1);
>> out:
>> 	fdplock(fdp);
>> 	fdremove(fdp, tmpfd);