patrick keshishian <sidster@boxsoft.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > that is fine by me but i hadn;t meant you to shorten to [x:..] - i just
> > didn't bother to type it in full. so i think you should use the correct
> > notation (as you had originally).
> > 
> > sorry for the confusion!
> 
> Oops. Sorry :-)

looks good to me; committed, thank you!