Download raw body.
calendar(1): introduce RECIPIENT_EMAIL
> On 4 Feb 2025, at 01:55, Vitaliy Makkoveev <mvs@openbsd.org> wrote: > >> On 4 Feb 2025, at 01:46, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@openbsd.org> wrote: >> >> Vitaliy Makkoveev <mvs@openbsd.org> wrote: >> >>>> On 4 Feb 2025, at 01:22, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@openbsd.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> What is the point of this 'validation'? >>>> >>>> If the environment variable is trash, the mail doesn't work. >>> >>> To prevent silent e-mail loss. The "sendmail: command failed: 501 >>> 5.1.3 Recipient address syntax error" in the syslog looks not >>> correlating with calendar(1) to me. >>> >>> Anyway, my question is not requirement, right? >> >> If a user, in trying to redirect output away from their tty, misconfigures >> to create such a ridiculous failure, is there any requirement that they >> receive a problem report? >> > > No :) > > I have objections against initial diff. Do you? > Sorry, I have no objections of course.
calendar(1): introduce RECIPIENT_EMAIL