Index | Thread | Search

From:
Vitaliy Makkoveev <mvs@openbsd.org>
Subject:
Re: calendar(1): introduce RECIPIENT_EMAIL
To:
Theo de Raadt <deraadt@openbsd.org>
Cc:
tech@openbsd.org
Date:
Tue, 4 Feb 2025 01:59:50 +0300

Download raw body.

Thread
> On 4 Feb 2025, at 01:55, Vitaliy Makkoveev <mvs@openbsd.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 4 Feb 2025, at 01:46, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@openbsd.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Vitaliy Makkoveev <mvs@openbsd.org> wrote:
>> 
>>>> On 4 Feb 2025, at 01:22, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@openbsd.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> What is the point of this 'validation'?
>>>> 
>>>> If the environment variable is trash, the mail doesn't work.
>>> 
>>> To prevent silent e-mail loss. The "sendmail: command failed: 501
>>> 5.1.3 Recipient address syntax error" in the syslog looks not
>>> correlating with calendar(1) to me.
>>> 
>>> Anyway, my question is not requirement, right?
>> 
>> If a user, in trying to redirect output away from their tty, misconfigures
>> to create such a ridiculous failure, is there any requirement that they
>> receive a problem report?
>> 
> 
> No :)
> 
> I have objections against initial diff. Do you?
> 

Sorry, I have no objections of course.