On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:56 PM Alexander Bluhm <alexander.bluhm@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 02:24:12PM +0900, ASOU Masato wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 2:19???PM ASOU Masato <takeasou.masato@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I applied your patch and following diff:
>
> With a slightly different patch for ld.so, only run-regress-prog1
> of regress is failing.  I moved down the call to _dl_unlink_children()
> a bit.  Also with this fix, a workaround a patch for llvm-openmp
> can be removed.  It seems that the callbacks are called in the right
> order now.
>
> Nevertheless, the failing regress looks relevant regarding ordering
> of destructors and needs more thoughts.
>
> bluhm

Maybe I found the cause of this problem.  I think it's a problem with
the `next' and `prev' opelations below:

struct elf_object {
</snip>
        struct elf_object *next;
        struct elf_object *prev;

Please give me some more time.
--
ASOU Masato