Index | Thread | Search

From:
"Theo de Raadt" <deraadt@openbsd.org>
Subject:
Re: Fix nested copy(9) for btrace's ustack
To:
Christian Ludwig <cludwig@genua.de>
Cc:
tech@openbsd.org
Date:
Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:14:43 -0700

Download raw body.

Thread
It seems like a huge change in behaviour to have nested operations here.

I'm suspicious that it only requires these two changes, and anticipate
the entire mechanism can't be moved from singular to nested with just
this.  That prompts the questions:  How did we get here, and is this
viable recursion???  I strongly suspect no.