Dear all,

Had a super interesting converstion with beck@ in which he convinced me
that it'll be better to revert course here and go a different direction.

There is a lot of complexity around fetching RPKI TA certifcates and
automatically selecting one that probably^Hhopefully doesn't mess up the
tree (such as the still-valid olden narrowly rfc3779-constrained trust
anchor certificate issuances). Instead, we can work towards maintaining
this aspect as a more traditional rootstore (/etc/rpki/certs.pem). 

In Dutch there is a saying appropriate for this situation: "Beter ten
halve gekeerd, dan ten heele gedwaald".

First step, let's cancel this timer before release and reconsider the
next steps. OK?

Kind regards,

Job

Index: cert.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rpki-client/cert.c,v
diff -u -p -r1.155 cert.c
--- cert.c	18 Dec 2024 21:12:26 -0000	1.155
+++ cert.c	21 Mar 2025 18:10:55 -0000
@@ -1061,72 +1061,6 @@ badcert:
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-/*
- * Reject TA certificates with an overly long validity period.
- *
- * The schedule is as follows:
- * Before February 2nd, 2026, warn on TA certs valid for longer than 15 years.
- * After February 2nd, 2026, reject TA certs valid for longer than 15 years.
- * Before March 3rd, 2027, warn on TA certs valid for longer than 3 years.
- * After March 3rd, 2027, reject TA certs valid for longer than 3 years.
- *
- * Return 1 if the validity period is acceptable and 0 otherwise.
- */
-static int
-ta_check_validity(const char *fn, const struct cert *p, time_t now)
-{
-	time_t validity = p->notafter - p->notbefore;
-	time_t cutoff_15y = 1769990400; /* 2026-02-02T00:00:00Z */
-	time_t cutoff_3y = 1804032000; /* 2027-03-03T00:00:00Z */
-	time_t cutoff = cutoff_3y;
-	int warn_years = 3;
-	int exceeds_15y = 0, exceeds_3y = 0;
-	int complain = 0, acceptable = 1;
-
-	if (validity >= 15 * 365 * 86400)
-		exceeds_15y = 1;
-	if (validity >= 3 * 365 * 86400)
-		exceeds_3y = 1;
-
-	if (now < cutoff_15y) {
-		warn_years = 15;
-		cutoff = cutoff_15y;
-		if (exceeds_15y)
-			complain = 1;
-	} else if (now < cutoff_3y) {
-		if (exceeds_15y)
-			acceptable = 0;
-		if (exceeds_3y)
-			complain = 1;
-	} else if (exceeds_3y) {
-		acceptable = 0;
-		complain = 1;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Suppress warnings for previously fetched TA certs.
-	 */
-	if (verbose == 0 && strncmp(fn, "ta/", strlen("ta/")) == 0)
-		goto out;
-
-	if (!acceptable) {
-		warnx("%s: TA cert rejected: validity period exceeds %d years. "
-		    "Ask the TA operator to reissue their TA cert with a "
-		    "shorter validity period.", fn, warn_years);
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	if (complain) {
-		warnx("%s: TA validity period exceeds %d years. After %s this "
-		    "certificate will be rejected.", fn, warn_years,
-		    time2str(cutoff));
-		goto out;
-	}
-
- out:
-	return acceptable;
-}
-
 struct cert *
 ta_parse(const char *fn, struct cert *p, const unsigned char *pkey,
     size_t pkeysz)
@@ -1161,9 +1095,6 @@ ta_parse(const char *fn, struct cert *p,
 		warnx("%s: certificate has expired", fn);
 		goto badcert;
 	}
-	if (!ta_check_validity(fn, p, now))
-		goto badcert;
-
 	if (p->aki != NULL && strcmp(p->aki, p->ski)) {
 		warnx("%s: RFC 6487 section 4.8.3: "
 		    "trust anchor AKI, if specified, must match SKI", fn);