April 3, 2025 8:16 PM, op@omarpolo.com wrote:

> Hello tech, Gilles,
> 

Hellow,


> This fixes an issue reported by runxiyu on #opensmtpd on irc, and also
> on the -portable repository on github.
> 
> We're currently always returning a tempfail regardless of what the lmtp
> server says; I believe that we should forward a permfail as well.
> 
> This is the same diff as <https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/pull/1277>
> except that i've expanded the ternary into an if to not run over 80 columns.
> 
> thoughts/oks?
> 

This reads ok to me


> diff /usr/src
> path + /usr/src
> commit - f3da64206be0d25ac3918cef310a098b8dd037b2
> blob - d460f4ca8c19e5406271cf1515d6a31fdc3eeb47
> file + usr.sbin/smtpd/mail.lmtp.c
> --- usr.sbin/smtpd/mail.lmtp.c
> +++ usr.sbin/smtpd/mail.lmtp.c
> @@ -261,8 +261,12 @@ lmtp_engine(int fd_read, struct session *session)
> (line[3] != ' ' && line[3] != '-'))
> errx(EX_TEMPFAIL, "LMTP server sent an invalid line");
> 
> - if (line[0] != (phase == PHASE_DATA ? '3' : '2'))
> - errx(EX_TEMPFAIL, "LMTP server error: %s", line);
> + if (line[0] != (phase == PHASE_DATA ? '3' : '2')) {
> + int code = EX_TEMPFAIL;
> + if (line[0] != '4')
> + code = EX_UNAVAILABLE;
> + errx(code, "LMTP server error: %s", line);
> + }
> 
> if (line[3] == '-')
> continue;