On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 04:48:45PM +1000, Ross L Richardson wrote:
> 
> AFAICT, ivaf(4) doesn't exist.  My guess is that iavf(4) was intended.
> 
> The problem seems to have come from plus.html, so that presumably should
> be fixed, too.

thanks, fixed

mistake was in the if_iavf.c commit message

----------------------------
revision 1.18
date: 2024/11/27 02:40:53;  author: yasuoka;  state: Exp;  lines: +86 -15;  commitid: pKDKkqzkcRRLYGsS;
Enable rx/tx checksum offloading on ivaf(4).
from Yuichiro NAITO and jan; test jan

ok jan jmatthew
----------------------------