Tom Smyth <tom.smyth@wirelessconnect.eu> wrote:

> Would it make sense to call it openlldpd ? 
> 
> I think it is worthwhile to distinguish  lldpd from openlldpd  
> 
> it is worth distinguishing the OpenBSD daemon from the other older daemon  has an
> established name...

That is precisely what we are trying to avoid.  In the long term, noone will
use the ports version.  I've reviewed it, and this is not something I would run,
because it jumped the shark many years ago.

> for what its worth the naming of httpd was a disaster because it is shared with apache
> ...and trying to find information in the internet on httpd is confusing for users
> because of Apaches huge install base and article reference base... 

I don't buy that argument.  If that's the approach being done by users, then
it means our own documentation is lacking.  It's entirely backwards.