Index | Thread | Search

From:
Jason McIntyre <jmc@kerhand.co.uk>
Subject:
Re: do not add default routes with blackhole or reject to the egress group
To:
tech@openbsd.org
Date:
Wed, 14 May 2025 06:50:13 +0100

Download raw body.

Thread
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 01:54:42AM +0200, Micha?? Markowski wrote:
> czw., 1 maj 2025 o 20:52 Micha?? Markowski <markowski1@gmail.com> napisa??(a):
> > Maybe this should be mentioned explicitly in ifconfig(8).
> >
> > --- sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.8
> > +++ sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.8
> > @@ -247,7 +247,11 @@ interface group.
> >  .It
> >  The interfaces the default routes point to are members of the
> >  .Dq egress
> > -interface group.
> > +interface group, except for the ones marked with
> > +.Fl blackhole
> > +or
> > +.Fl reject
> > +flag.
> >  .It
> >  IEEE 802.11 wireless interfaces are members of the
> >  .Dq wlan
> 
> Any thoughts on this?
> 

i don;t understand it myself - don;t these flags apply to routes, rather
than interfaces?

having said that, for your language i suggest either

	marked with *the* -blackhole or -reject flag.
or
	marked with -blackhole or -reject.

jmc