Hello,

On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 05:07:18PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 16:02:13 +0200
> > From: Alexandr Nedvedicky <sashan@fastmail.net>
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 01:11:40PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > 
> > </snip>
> > > 
> > > That seems like a reasonable assumption.  But we should probably avoid
> > > the copyin() altogether (and just terminate the trace) if f.f_frame is
> > > a kernel address.  So something like:
> > > 
> > >                 if (userland == 1 && INKERNEL(f.f_frame))
> > > 		        break;
> > > 
> > > somewhere near the top of the while loop.
> > > 
> > 
> >     yes, it makes perfect sense. thanks for the suggestion.
> >     updated diff follows. it still works on i386.
> 
> But you just moved the f.f_retaddr check, I'm talking about adding an
> f.f_frame check.
> 

I'm afraid I don't follow. I'm going to paste the complete
stacktrace_save_utrace() function here after applying the latest diff:


     1	void
     2	stacktrace_save_utrace(struct stacktrace *st)
     3	{
     4		struct callframe f, *frame, *lastframe;
     5		struct pcb *pcb = curpcb;
     6		int userland = 0;
     7	
     8		st->st_count = 0;
     9	
    10		if (pcb == NULL)
    11			return;
    12	
    13		frame = __builtin_frame_address(0);
    14		KASSERT(INKERNEL(frame));
    15		f = *frame;
    16	
    17		curcpu()->ci_inatomic++;
    18		while (st->st_count < STACKTRACE_MAX) {
    19			/*
    20			 * Don't trust f.f_retaddr if it came from userland via copyin
    21			 */
    22			if (userland == 1 && INKERNEL(f.f_retaddr))
    23				break;
    24	
    25			if (f.f_retaddr != 0 && !INKERNEL(f.f_retaddr))
    26				st->st_pc[st->st_count++] = f.f_retaddr;
    27	
    28			lastframe = frame;
    29			frame = f.f_frame;
    30	
    31			if (frame == NULL)
    32				break;
    33			if (INKERNEL(f.f_retaddr)) {
    34				if (frame <= lastframe)
    35					break;
    36				f = *frame;
    37				continue;
    38			}
    39			if (!INKERNEL(lastframe) && frame <= lastframe)
    40				break;
    41			if (copyin(frame, &f, sizeof(f)) != 0)
    42				break;
    43			userland = 1;
    44		}
    45		curcpu()->ci_inatomic--;
    46	}

If I understand things right we always start with backtrace in
kernel space (according to KASSERT() at line 14.

In the first iteration of while loop the userland is zero,
therefore we never take a branch at line 22.

at line 36 we move to the next frame and jump back to the
beginning of while loop (line 37).

This goes that way as long as we are walking up the stack
in kernel. As soon as we reach to the frame where return
address is from userland we won't take branch at line
33 and continue execution at line 39.

Line 39 makes sure we don't run out from the stack.

at line 41 we do copyin() the next frame from userland.
at line 43 we make a note that all frames which will
follow must be coming from userland. So we won't
get eventually confused if userland stack is either
corrupted or its stack frame is not set up.

thanks and
regards
sashan