Index | Thread | Search

From:
"Anthony J. Bentley" <bentley@openbsd.org>
Subject:
Re: pledge(2) in fc-cache(1)
To:
tech@openbsd.org
Date:
Fri, 23 May 2025 04:51:42 -0600

Download raw body.

Thread
Kirill A. Korinsky writes:
> I think that the right way is send it to upstream to do not increase burden
> of updating xenocara.
>
> Am I wrong?

We maintain small local changes in some cases. For example, in
fccompat.c we modify FcRandom() to use arc4random(3). But of course
it's generally ideal to push changes upstream, when they're the kind
upstream would accept.