On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 01:50:30PM +0200, Hans-J?rg H?xer wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 12:39:07PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > This breaks the build on arm64. Untested diff below fixes it:
> 
> sorry for that!  Adding stubs for arm64 looks right to me.  We also need
> one for psp_setup().  Amended diff below.

Currently I have no arm64 machine to compile test it.

tb@, can you compile and commit this?

Having a psp_setup() stub makes sense, maybe we can get rid of
#ifdef __amd64__ later.

OK bluhm@

> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> diff --git a/usr.sbin/vmd/arm64_vm.c b/usr.sbin/vmd/arm64_vm.c
> index 2eec85d6f83..fbe1e2afc40 100644
> --- a/usr.sbin/vmd/arm64_vm.c
> +++ b/usr.sbin/vmd/arm64_vm.c
> @@ -209,3 +209,26 @@ sev_encrypt_memory(struct vmd_vm *vm)
>  	/* NOTREACHED */
>  	return (-1);
>  }
> +
> +int
> +sev_encrypt_state(struct vmd_vm *vm, int vcpu_id)
> +{
> +	fatalx("%s: unimplemented", __func__);
> +	/* NOTREACHED */
> +	return (-1);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +sev_launch_finalize(struct vmd_vm *vm)
> +{
> +	fatalx("%s: unimplemented", __func__);
> +	/* NOTREACHED */
> +	return (-1);
> +}
> +
> +void
> +psp_setup(void)
> +{
> +	fatalx("%s: unimplemented", __func__);
> +	/* NOTREACHED */
> +}