Download raw body.
sysupgrade vs NFS
14.06.2025 13:30, Marc Espie пишет:
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Here's a better patch.
I have not seen any actual error or explanation as to what goes wrong,
thus I don't understand where this is coming from.
>
> I've left out the usage of err for now, because it's not consistently
> used in that script.
>
> Index: sysupgrade.8
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /build/data/openbsd/cvs/src/usr.sbin/sysupgrade/sysupgrade.8,v
> diff -u -p -r1.13 sysupgrade.8
> --- sysupgrade.8 8 Jun 2022 09:03:11 -0000 1.13
> +++ sysupgrade.8 14 Jun 2025 10:23:50 -0000
> @@ -99,3 +99,6 @@ Directory the upgrade is downloaded to.
> .Nm
> first appeared in
> .Ox 6.6 .
> +.Sh BUGS AND LIMITATIONS
> +.Nm
> +currently does not support downloading the sets to a NFS or MFS partition.
# mount localhost:/home /mnt
# sysupgrade -n -s -b/mnt
...
Will upgrade on next reboot
# umount /mnt
# mount_mfs -s 3g swap /mnt
# sysupgrade -n -s -b/mnt
...
Will upgrade on next reboot
Your sentence says no, but sysupgrade did its job.
From here bootloader and then installer take over.
What is the actual problem?
> Index: sysupgrade.sh> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /build/data/openbsd/cvs/src/usr.sbin/sysupgrade/sysupgrade.sh,v
> diff -u -p -r1.52 sysupgrade.sh
> --- sysupgrade.sh 19 Jun 2024 05:22:33 -0000 1.52
> +++ sysupgrade.sh 14 Jun 2025 10:21:06 -0000
> @@ -132,6 +132,11 @@ fi
>
> install -d -o 0 -g 0 -m 0755 ${SETSDIR}
> cd ${SETSDIR}
> +if df -t nfs,mfs ${SETSDIR} >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
> +then
> + echo "Error: ${SETSDIR} on NFS or MFS is currently not supported"
> + exit 1
> +fi
Why care for MFS? Does anyone really expect that to survive reboot?
>
> echo "Fetching from ${URL}"
> unpriv -f SHA256.sig ftp -N sysupgrade -Vmo SHA256.sig ${URL}SHA256.sig
>
sysupgrade vs NFS