On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:45:25 -0600, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:

> I suspect what's going on here is the driver wants to provide a unique
> error number for a failure condition which will print a different
> (obscure, but different) error message to a user or an unknown test
> program.  So they chose EREMOTE, rather than ENOMEDIUM or EBADRPC or
> 37373.

Yes, that seems likely.  The Intel drm code appears to take a lot
of liberties with errno values.  For example, it uses ESTALE for
some things.  Who knows whether those values ever reach the user.

 - todd