On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 02:06:12PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > Typo here. This should be RFC 9582 not 6582 (The NewReno Modification to
> > TCP's Fast Recovery Algorithm).
> 
> Thanks. Fixed before commit.
> 
> Here's the analogous diff for manifests. Unlike for ROAs, the relevant
> section numbers still match in the new RFC.

Go for it.
 
> Index: extern.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rpki-client/extern.h,v
> diff -u -p -r1.259 extern.h
> --- extern.h	24 Aug 2025 11:52:20 -0000	1.259
> +++ extern.h	24 Aug 2025 11:59:21 -0000
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ struct mftfile {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> - * A manifest, RFC 6486.
> + * A manifest, RFC 9286.
>   * This consists of a bunch of files found in the same directory as the
>   * manifest file.
>   */
> Index: main.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rpki-client/main.c,v
> diff -u -p -r1.294 main.c
> --- main.c	23 Aug 2025 09:13:14 -0000	1.294
> +++ main.c	24 Aug 2025 11:59:21 -0000
> @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ rrdp_http_done(unsigned int id, enum htt
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Add a file (CER, ROA, CRL) from an MFT file, RFC 6486.
> + * Add a file (CER, ROA, CRL, ...) from a manifest fileList, RFC 9286.
>   * These are always relative to the directory in which "mft" sits.
>   */
>  static void
> Index: mft.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rpki-client/mft.c,v
> diff -u -p -r1.129 mft.c
> --- mft.c	23 Aug 2025 09:13:14 -0000	1.129
> +++ mft.c	24 Aug 2025 11:59:21 -0000
> @@ -39,13 +39,8 @@
>   * Manifest eContent definition in RFC 9286, section 4.2.
>   */
>  
> -ASN1_ITEM_EXP FileAndHash_it;
>  ASN1_ITEM_EXP Manifest_it;
> -
> -ASN1_SEQUENCE(FileAndHash) = {
> -	ASN1_SIMPLE(FileAndHash, file, ASN1_IA5STRING),
> -	ASN1_SIMPLE(FileAndHash, hash, ASN1_BIT_STRING),
> -} ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(FileAndHash);
> +ASN1_ITEM_EXP FileAndHash_it;
>  
>  ASN1_SEQUENCE(Manifest) = {
>  	ASN1_EXP_OPT(Manifest, version, ASN1_INTEGER, 0),
> @@ -58,6 +53,10 @@ ASN1_SEQUENCE(Manifest) = {
>  
>  IMPLEMENT_ASN1_FUNCTIONS(Manifest);
>  
> +ASN1_SEQUENCE(FileAndHash) = {
> +	ASN1_SIMPLE(FileAndHash, file, ASN1_IA5STRING),
> +	ASN1_SIMPLE(FileAndHash, hash, ASN1_BIT_STRING),
> +} ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(FileAndHash);
>  
>  #define GENTIME_LENGTH 15
>  
> @@ -146,7 +145,7 @@ rtype_from_mftfile(const char *fn)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Parse an individual "FileAndHash", RFC 6486, sec. 4.2.
> + * Parse an individual "FileAndHash", RFC 9286, sec. 4.2.
>   * Return zero on failure, non-zero on success.
>   */
>  static int
> @@ -160,7 +159,7 @@ mft_parse_filehash(const char *fn, struc
>  	size_t			 new_idx = 0;
>  
>  	if (!valid_mft_filename(fh->file->data, fh->file->length)) {
> -		warnx("%s: RFC 6486 section 4.2.2: bad filename", fn);
> +		warnx("%s: RFC 9286 section 4.2.2: bad filename", fn);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  	file = strndup(fh->file->data, fh->file->length);
> @@ -168,7 +167,7 @@ mft_parse_filehash(const char *fn, struc
>  		err(1, NULL);
>  
>  	if (fh->hash->length != SHA256_DIGEST_LENGTH) {
> -		warnx("%s: RFC 6486 section 4.2.1: hash: "
> +		warnx("%s: RFC 9286 section 4.2.1: hash: "
>  		    "invalid SHA256 length, have %d", fn, fh->hash->length);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> @@ -280,7 +279,7 @@ mft_has_unique_names_and_hashes(const ch
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Handle the eContent of the manifest object, RFC 6486 sec. 4.2.
> + * Handle the eContent of the manifest object, RFC 9286 sec. 4.2.
>   * Returns 0 on failure and 1 on success.
>   */
>  static int
> @@ -294,7 +293,7 @@ mft_parse_econtent(const char *fn, struc
>  
>  	oder = d;
>  	if ((mft_asn1 = d2i_Manifest(NULL, &d, dsz)) == NULL) {
> -		warnx("%s: RFC 6486 section 4: failed to parse Manifest", fn);
> +		warnx("%s: RFC 9286 section 4: failed to parse Manifest", fn);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  	if (d != oder + dsz) {
> @@ -339,7 +338,7 @@ mft_parse_econtent(const char *fn, struc
>  	}
>  
>  	if (OBJ_obj2nid(mft_asn1->fileHashAlg) != NID_sha256) {
> -		warnx("%s: RFC 6486 section 4.2.1: fileHashAlg: "
> +		warnx("%s: RFC 9286 section 4.2.1: fileHashAlg: "
>  		    "want SHA256 object, have %s", fn,
>  		    nid2str(OBJ_obj2nid(mft_asn1->fileHashAlg)));
>  		goto out;
> @@ -384,7 +383,7 @@ mft_parse_econtent(const char *fn, struc
>  
>  /*
>   * Parse the objects that have been published in the manifest.
> - * Return mft if it conforms to RFC 6486, otherwise NULL.
> + * Return mft if it conforms to RFC 9286, otherwise NULL.
>   */
>  struct mft *
>  mft_parse(struct cert **out_cert, const char *fn, int talid,

-- 
:wq Claudio