On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 12:59:01PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 10:43:17AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > These are four sizeable allocations (64k each) that running in filemode
> > with MALLOC_OPTIONS=-D shows. Not really an issue but since we also
> > close the corresponding file descriptors, we should probably also
> > release these.
> > 
> > The remaining things flagged by -D in filemode are the global OIDs
> > from x509_init_oid() and the tals[] from tal_load_default().
> > 
> > Index: main.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rpki-client/main.c,v
> > diff -u -p -r1.302 main.c
> > --- main.c	13 Nov 2025 15:18:53 -0000	1.302
> > +++ main.c	31 Dec 2025 09:37:16 -0000
> > @@ -1485,9 +1485,15 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >  	 */
> >  
> >  	close(procfd);
> > +	msgbuf_free(procq);
> >  	close(rsyncfd);
> > +	msgbuf_free(rsyncq);
> >  	close(httpfd);
> > +	msgbuf_free(httpq);
> >  	close(rrdpfd);
> > +	msgbuf_free(rrdpq);
> > +	procq = rsyncq = httpq = rrdpq = NULL;
> > +	memset(queues, 0, sizeof(queues));
> >  
> >  	rc = 0;
> >  	for (;;) {
> > 
> 
> To be honest I think the better way is to check the noop flag and only
> fumble with most of those fds and msgbufs if those things are actually
> running. Right now in -n and -f mode most of those close call are with a
> -1 argument.
>
> Doing this correctly needs a bigger refactor since e.g. the NPFD usage
> needs to become dynamic.

I don't disagree but I think this is independent of my change.