What I meant is that when the LLM did try to read Linux source code
from HTTPS I stopped it and found another way.

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 8:16 PM Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> wrote:
>
> On 2026/03/17 20:04, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
> > https://www.kmx.io/static/patches/OpenBSD-current-ext4fs.diff
> >
> > SHA256 : deeabe0d87b9c839563aa0c2dc67198bc6802ee8aedc100028f5648601b448c6
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 7:26 PM Thomas de Grivel <thodg@kmx.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi tech@,
> > >
> > > Here is a patch to attach ext4fs drives to OpenBSD with full ext4
> > > support (compatible with recent Linux).
> > >
> > > Performances are 610MB/s read/write vs 830MB/s for FFS2 on an NVMe.
> > >
> > > No journalling. Recovery at mount time not tested.
> > >
> > > All tests pass e2fstools / e2fsck without trouble. Please test and
> > > reply without too much flames as I'm rather new to the kernel side of
> > > development.
> > >
> > > I hope this helps,
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> >
>
> from your blog entry,
>
> "No Linux source files were ever read to build this driver. It's pure AI
> (ChatGPT and Claude-code) and careful code reviews and error checking
> and building kernel and rebooting/testing from my part."
>
> not sure what the copyright situation is regarding this, certainly those
> LLMs will have been trained on code including GPL...
>