On Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 11:29:41PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> I think the right fix is use getnanotime() instead nanotime() like FFS and
> MFS.
> 
> Thougs? Ok?

Seems logical to me.

> 
> 
> Index: tmpfs_subr.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/tmpfs/tmpfs_subr.c,v
> diff -u -p -r1.27 tmpfs_subr.c
> --- tmpfs_subr.c	12 Sep 2024 09:04:51 -0000	1.27
> +++ tmpfs_subr.c	28 Mar 2026 22:03:32 -0000
> @@ -1140,7 +1140,7 @@ tmpfs_update(tmpfs_node_t *node, int fla
>  {
>  	struct timespec nowtm;
>  
> -	nanotime(&nowtm);
> +	getnanotime(&nowtm);
>  
>  	if (flags & TMPFS_NODE_ACCESSED) {
>  		node->tn_atime = nowtm;
> 
> 
>