On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 5:28 PM Theo de Raadt <deraadt@openbsd.org> wrote:
>
> We don't put code into the tree that we don't
>
> 1) have hardware for
>
>   and
>
> 2) want to take on as a responsibility.
>
> riscv64 is only happening in-tree because at least 15 developers
> have the hardware.
>
> This does not meet the bar.

This is of course the only rational position. I just hope that
Loongson could become a reasonable alternative to intel/AMD in the
future, seeing how I'm not a big fan of the mandatory secret CSME and
PSP. If someone can turn my CPU into a key-collector I prefer that it
goes to China because they have a lot less power to do anything to me
if there's something they don't like.