Index | Thread | Search

From:
Antoine Jacoutot <ajacoutot@bsdfrog.org>
Subject:
Re: Clarify -f option in dbupdate(8), tune -n
To:
Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>
Cc:
cs@schulte.it, tech@openbsd.org, stu@spacehopper.org
Date:
Sun, 1 Nov 2026 14:29:26 +0100

Download raw body.

Thread
On Sun, Nov 01, 2026 at 07:01:13AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> My plan for dbupdate is to run it from the _weekly_ script (since TZ
> updates have historically always had at least 1 week heads up even from
> the most retarded governments), and I suspect this will also cover
> problems with certs quickly enough.
> 
> Users can always run it manually themselves, in which case the weekly
> run will notice it does not need to do the large download operation.
> On that matter:
> 
> I am not seriouslyu concerned about having all openbsd machines in timezone
> stripe hitting downloads for (typically) a single file at the same time,
> if I change it to use cdn.openbsd.org
> 
> I am considering whether the installurl mirror should be used, or if
> it we should make it use the cdn (for the potential pressure)...
> 
> Maybe try to use the cdn first, failover the installurl.  It is possible
> someone will run an underbuilt mirror because too many users end up
> pointing at it without them knowing.  The cdn is much better prepared
> to handle this.

I am not concerned about this.
Mirrors already get their fair share of pkg_add -un and syspatch -n. And I am
not talking about all the rsync or http mirror syncs.

-- 
Antoine