From: Claudio Jeker Subject: Re: net lock kernel lock order To: Alexander Bluhm Cc: tech@openbsd.org Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 17:32:27 +0100 On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 03:24:44PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 03:05:44PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 01:26:15PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We have code that takes kernel lock just before net lock. As net > > > lock is a rwlock that releases kernel lock while sleeping, there > > > is never deadlock due to lock ordering. > > > > > > The order kernel lock -> net lock is suboptimal. If net lock is > > > held by another thread the following happens: > > > > > > take kernel lock -> try net lock -> release kernel lock -> sleep > > > -> take net lock -> take kernel lock > > > > this is incorrect. the kernel lock is aquired before the rwlock in a sleep > > call. > > Yes. The kernel lock dance is done in mi_switch(). So the correct > old sequence is: > > take kernel lock -> try net lock -> release kernel lock -> sleep > -> take kernel lock -> take net lock > > But that does not change my argument that the sequence with my diff > is cheaper. But is this lock reversal safe? Is there no NET_LOCK somewhere in an interrupt handler that could run while KERNEL_LOCK is held? > > > If we change the order we get a less expensive sequence: > > > > > > try net lock -> sleep -> take net lock -> take kernel lock > > > > > > ok? > > > > > > bluhm > > > > > > Index: net/if.c > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/net/if.c,v > > > diff -u -p -r1.714 if.c > > > --- net/if.c 29 Dec 2023 11:43:04 -0000 1.714 > > > +++ net/if.c 5 Jan 2024 12:08:01 -0000 > > > @@ -1774,16 +1774,16 @@ if_linkstate_task(void *xifidx) > > > unsigned int ifidx = (unsigned long)xifidx; > > > struct ifnet *ifp; > > > > > > - KERNEL_LOCK(); > > > NET_LOCK(); > > > + KERNEL_LOCK(); > > > > > > ifp = if_get(ifidx); > > > if (ifp != NULL) > > > if_linkstate(ifp); > > > if_put(ifp); > > > > > > - NET_UNLOCK(); > > > KERNEL_UNLOCK(); > > > + NET_UNLOCK(); > > > } > > > > > > void > > > Index: netinet/in.c > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/netinet/in.c,v > > > diff -u -p -r1.185 in.c > > > --- netinet/in.c 28 Jun 2023 11:49:49 -0000 1.185 > > > +++ netinet/in.c 5 Jan 2024 12:10:07 -0000 > > > @@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ in_ioctl(u_long cmd, caddr_t data, struc > > > return (error); > > > } > > > > > > - KERNEL_LOCK(); > > > NET_LOCK(); > > > + KERNEL_LOCK(); > > > > > > TAILQ_FOREACH(ifa, &ifp->if_addrlist, ifa_list) { > > > if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET) > > > @@ -331,8 +331,8 @@ in_ioctl(u_long cmd, caddr_t data, struc > > > break; > > > } > > > err: > > > - NET_UNLOCK(); > > > KERNEL_UNLOCK(); > > > + NET_UNLOCK(); > > > return (error); > > > } > > > > > > @@ -353,8 +353,8 @@ in_ioctl_set_ifaddr(u_long cmd, caddr_t > > > if (error) > > > return (error); > > > > > > - KERNEL_LOCK(); > > > NET_LOCK(); > > > + KERNEL_LOCK(); > > > > > > TAILQ_FOREACH(ifa, &ifp->if_addrlist, ifa_list) { > > > if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET) > > > @@ -387,8 +387,8 @@ in_ioctl_set_ifaddr(u_long cmd, caddr_t > > > if (!error) > > > if_addrhooks_run(ifp); > > > > > > - NET_UNLOCK(); > > > KERNEL_UNLOCK(); > > > + NET_UNLOCK(); > > > return error; > > > } > > > > > > @@ -409,8 +409,8 @@ in_ioctl_change_ifaddr(u_long cmd, caddr > > > return (error); > > > } > > > > > > - KERNEL_LOCK(); > > > NET_LOCK(); > > > + KERNEL_LOCK(); > > > > > > TAILQ_FOREACH(ifa, &ifp->if_addrlist, ifa_list) { > > > if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET) > > > @@ -527,8 +527,8 @@ in_ioctl_change_ifaddr(u_long cmd, caddr > > > panic("%s: invalid ioctl %lu", __func__, cmd); > > > } > > > > > > - NET_UNLOCK(); > > > KERNEL_UNLOCK(); > > > + NET_UNLOCK(); > > > return (error); > > > } > > > > > > > > > > -- > > :wq Claudio > -- :wq Claudio