From: Otto Moerbeek <otto@drijf.net>
Subject: Re: sysctl for ffs index wrong
To: Federico Giannici <giannici@neomedia.it>
Cc: tech@openbsd.org
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:28:43 +0200

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 08:08:01AM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:

> There will be a syspatch for this, or we have to build a kernel?
> 
> Thanks

AFAIKS it's enough to install the patched ffs_extern.h to
/usr/include/ufs/ffs/ffs_extern.h and rebuild and install sbin/sysctl.

Erratum is not decided yet.

	-Otto

> 
> 
> On 4/11/24 18:09, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > OK
> > 
> > Otto Moerbeek <otto@drijf.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > followup on an issue reported on misc:
> > > 
> > > The softdep removel went a step too far by removing the "max_softdeps" entry
> > > 
> > > http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_extern.h.diff?r1=1.45&r2=1.46
> > > 
> > > This makes the dirhash sysctl ok again.
> > > 
> > > 	-Otto
> > > 
> > > Index: ufs/ffs/ffs_extern.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_extern.h,v
> > > diff -u -p -r1.46 ffs_extern.h
> > > --- ufs/ffs/ffs_extern.h	3 Feb 2024 18:51:58 -0000	1.46
> > > +++ ufs/ffs/ffs_extern.h	11 Apr 2024 15:20:41 -0000
> > > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
> > >   	{ 0, 0 }, \
> > >   	{ 0, 0 }, \
> > >   	{ 0, 0 }, \
> > > +	{ 0, 0 }, \
> > >   	{ "sd_tickdelay", CTLTYPE_INT }, \
> > >   	{ "sd_worklist_push", CTLTYPE_INT }, \
> > >   	{ "sd_blk_limit_push", CTLTYPE_INT }, \
> > > 
> > 
>