From: Katherine Mcmillan Subject: Re: mandoc: add POSIX 2024 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: "tech@openbsd.org" Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:03:01 +0000 "The handful of references to -susv2 in lib/libpthread could be replaced with references to ISO 1003.1?" Wouldn't it be ISO 9945? (IEEE 1003 I think that you're thinking of) -Katie ________________________________ From: owner-tech@openbsd.org on behalf of Mark Kettenis Sent: 17 June 2024 10:59 To: Job Snijders Cc: deraadt@openbsd.org ; schwarze@usta.de ; jmc@kerhand.co.uk ; tech@openbsd.org Subject: Re: mandoc: add POSIX 2024 Attention : courriel externe | external email > Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:45:06 +0000 > From: Job Snijders > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 05:06:38PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > Well we can't be Unix, right, because we don't pay anyone so > > how does SUS even apply? Best way to make it irrelevant is to > > not refer to it. > > It seems -susv1, -susv3, and -susv4 are not used in man pages in base at > all (other than mdoc). The handful of references to -susv2 in > lib/libpthread could be replaced with references to ISO 1003.1? Almost certainly not. POSIX was only a subset of SUS. The two were merged in v6 with the X/Open System Interfaces becoming an extension to POSIX. Some of those interfaces became standard POSIX interfaces in later revisions.