From: Theo Buehler Subject: Re: uvm_fault_lower(): document unlocking To: tech@openbsd.org Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:42:44 +0100 On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 09:24:30AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > In uvm_fault_lower() there's this unlocking dance that is different from > the rest of the fault handler which isn't obvious. > > The reason is that that kernel just copied the content of `uobjpage' to > a newly allocated anon and there is no need to hold the lock of `uobj' > any longer. > > Since this is no longer in NetBSD but I'd like to keep it instead of > holding the lock until after amap_add() and pmap_enter(), let's add some > comment. > > ok? ok tb > > diff --git sys/uvm/uvm_fault.c sys/uvm/uvm_fault.c > index e694554adf0..60694fcc802 100644 > --- sys/uvm/uvm_fault.c > +++ sys/uvm/uvm_fault.c > @@ -1401,6 +1401,7 @@ uvm_fault_lower(struct uvm_faultinfo *ufi, struct uvm_faultctx *flt, > uvm_lock_pageq(); > uvm_pageactivate(uobjpage); > uvm_unlock_pageq(); > + /* done with copied uobjpage. */ > rw_exit(uobj->vmobjlock); > uobj = NULL; > } else { > >