From: "Ted Unangst" Subject: lpt should not use bufs To: tech@openbsd.org Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 00:47:14 -0400 struct buf is not meant to be a generic malloc alternative. I think it's good, but uh, who has an lpt to test? Index: lpt.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/lpt.c,v diff -u -p -r1.15 lpt.c --- lpt.c 15 Jan 2020 16:43:13 -0000 1.15 +++ lpt.c 2 May 2025 04:45:12 -0000 @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ #include #include -#include +#include #include #include #include @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ lptopen(dev_t dev, int flag, int mode, s sc->sc_control = control; bus_space_write_1(sc->sc_iot, sc->sc_ioh, lpt_control, control); - sc->sc_inbuf = geteblk(LPT_BSIZE); + sc->sc_inbuf = malloc(LPT_BSIZE, M_DEVBUF, M_WAITOK); sc->sc_count = 0; sc->sc_state = LPT_OPEN; @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ lptclose(dev_t dev, int flag, int mode, bus_space_write_1(iot, ioh, lpt_control, LPC_NINIT); sc->sc_state = 0; bus_space_write_1(iot, ioh, lpt_control, LPC_NINIT); - brelse(sc->sc_inbuf); + free(sc->sc_inbuf, M_DEVBUF, LPT_BSIZE); LPRINTF(("%s: closed\n", sc->sc_dev.dv_xname)); return 0; @@ -370,7 +370,8 @@ lptwrite(dev_t dev, struct uio *uio, int int error = 0; while ((n = ulmin(LPT_BSIZE, uio->uio_resid)) != 0) { - error = uiomove(sc->sc_cp = sc->sc_inbuf->b_data, n, uio); + sc->sc_cp = sc->sc_inbuf; + error = uiomove(sc->sc_cp, n, uio); if (error != 0) return error; sc->sc_count = n; Index: lptvar.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/lptvar.h,v diff -u -p -r1.4 lptvar.h --- lptvar.h 12 Jun 2013 19:07:40 -0000 1.4 +++ lptvar.h 2 May 2025 04:34:40 -0000 @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ struct lpt_softc { struct timeout sc_wakeup_tmo; size_t sc_count; - struct buf *sc_inbuf; + void *sc_inbuf; u_int8_t *sc_cp; int sc_spinmax; bus_space_tag_t sc_iot; /* bus tag */