From: Todd C. Miller <millert@openbsd.org>
Subject: Re: fmemopen(3) Xr open_memstream(3)
To: "Omar Polo" <op@omarpolo.com>
Cc: tech@openbsd.org
Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 15:28:17 -0600

On Sat, 31 May 2025 23:26:54 +0200, "Omar Polo" wrote:

> Since the two functions are closely related (one operates on a given,
> fixed size buffer, the other on a dynamically allocated one) I think a
> Xr is not a bad idea.  fmemopen(3) already references open_memstream(3).
> (plus i think fmemopen is a more memorable name than open_memstream.)
>
> SEE ALSO still fits in a single line.

Makes sense to me.  OK millert@

 - todd