From: Stefan Sperling Subject: Re: bwfm fixes To: Moritz Buhl Cc: tech@openbsd.org Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 17:35:11 +0200 On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 01:55:54PM +0200, Moritz Buhl wrote: > still ok? > I would like to get this in as soon as possible to learn about any > regressions. > > mbuhl Yes, ok by me, please proceed. > Index: dev/ic/bwfm.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/bwfm.c,v > diff -u -p -r1.112 bwfm.c > --- dev/ic/bwfm.c 3 Aug 2025 14:25:32 -0000 1.112 > +++ dev/ic/bwfm.c 21 Aug 2025 11:40:18 -0000 > @@ -494,6 +494,7 @@ bwfm_init(struct ifnet *ifp) > BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_LINK); > BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_AUTH); > BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_ASSOC); > + BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_EAPOL_MSG); > BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_DEAUTH); > BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_DISASSOC); > BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_ESCAN_RESULT); > @@ -503,6 +504,7 @@ bwfm_init(struct ifnet *ifp) > BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_AUTH_IND); > BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_ASSOC_IND); > BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_REASSOC_IND); > + BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_EAPOL_MSG); > BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_DEAUTH_IND); > BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_DISASSOC_IND); > BWFM_EVENT(BWFM_E_ESCAN_RESULT); > @@ -2551,8 +2553,41 @@ void > bwfm_rx_event(struct bwfm_softc *sc, struct mbuf *m) > { > int s; > + struct ieee80211com *ic = &sc->sc_ic; > + struct bwfm_event *e = mtod(m, void *); > > s = splnet(); > + switch (ntohl(e->msg.event_type)) { > + case BWFM_E_AUTH: > + if (ntohl(e->msg.status) == BWFM_E_STATUS_SUCCESS && > + ic->ic_state == IEEE80211_S_AUTH) { > + ieee80211_new_state(ic, IEEE80211_S_ASSOC, -1); > + break; > + } > + goto enqueue; > + case BWFM_E_ASSOC: > + if (ntohl(e->msg.status) == BWFM_E_STATUS_SUCCESS && > + ic->ic_state == IEEE80211_S_ASSOC) { > + ieee80211_new_state(ic, IEEE80211_S_RUN, -1); > + } else if (ntohl(e->msg.status) != BWFM_E_STATUS_UNSOLICITED) { > + goto enqueue; > + } > + break; > + case BWFM_E_LINK: > + if (ntohl(e->msg.status) == BWFM_E_STATUS_SUCCESS && > + ntohl(e->msg.reason) == 0) > + break; > + goto enqueue; > + case BWFM_E_EAPOL_MSG: > + break; > + default: > + goto enqueue; > + } > + > + m_freem(m); > + splx(s); > + return; > +enqueue: > ml_enqueue(&sc->sc_evml, m); > splx(s); > > @@ -2631,17 +2666,13 @@ bwfm_rx_event_cb(struct bwfm_softc *sc, > break; > } > case BWFM_E_AUTH: > - if (ntohl(e->msg.status) == BWFM_E_STATUS_SUCCESS && > + if (ntohl(e->msg.status) != BWFM_E_STATUS_SUCCESS && > ic->ic_state == IEEE80211_S_AUTH) > - ieee80211_new_state(ic, IEEE80211_S_ASSOC, -1); > - else > ieee80211_begin_scan(ifp); > break; > case BWFM_E_ASSOC: > - if (ntohl(e->msg.status) == BWFM_E_STATUS_SUCCESS && > + if (ntohl(e->msg.status) != BWFM_E_STATUS_SUCCESS && > ic->ic_state == IEEE80211_S_ASSOC) > - ieee80211_new_state(ic, IEEE80211_S_RUN, -1); > - else if (ntohl(e->msg.status) != BWFM_E_STATUS_UNSOLICITED) > ieee80211_begin_scan(ifp); > break; > case BWFM_E_DEAUTH: > @@ -2650,9 +2681,6 @@ bwfm_rx_event_cb(struct bwfm_softc *sc, > ieee80211_begin_scan(ifp); > break; > case BWFM_E_LINK: > - if (ntohl(e->msg.status) == BWFM_E_STATUS_SUCCESS && > - ntohl(e->msg.reason) == 0) > - break; > /* Link status has changed */ > if (ic->ic_state > IEEE80211_S_SCAN) > ieee80211_begin_scan(ifp); > Index: dev/pci/if_bwfm_pci.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_bwfm_pci.c,v > diff -u -p -r1.77 if_bwfm_pci.c > --- dev/pci/if_bwfm_pci.c 12 Jul 2024 08:33:25 -0000 1.77 > +++ dev/pci/if_bwfm_pci.c 21 Aug 2025 09:58:37 -0000 > @@ -2369,9 +2369,9 @@ bwfm_pci_intr(void *v) > mask = BWFM_PCI_64_PCIE2REG_MAILBOXMASK_INT_D2H_DB; > > if (status & mask) { > + bwfm_pci_ring_rx(sc, &sc->sc_ctrl_complete, &ml); > bwfm_pci_ring_rx(sc, &sc->sc_rx_complete, &ml); > bwfm_pci_ring_rx(sc, &sc->sc_tx_complete, &ml); > - bwfm_pci_ring_rx(sc, &sc->sc_ctrl_complete, &ml); > > if (ifiq_input(&ifp->if_rcv, &ml)) > if_rxr_livelocked(&sc->sc_rxbuf_ring); >