From: "Theo de Raadt" <deraadt@openbsd.org>
Subject: Re: extend ptrace(2) PT_GET_THREAD_* to include thread names
To: kurt@intricatesoftware.com, cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, pascal@stumpf.co, ports@openbsd.org, tech@openbsd.org
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 19:14:25 -0700

> I got curious and looked at what it would take to support both the old
> and new structure sizes, and the diff below appears to work fine.  The
> issue is more of a problem on slower architectures where kernel and
> packages can stay unsynchronized for a longer time.  Thoughts?

I really don't believe in that 'support model'.  The people using those
machines build their own packages (or they don't, but that's not our
problem).