From: Kirill A. Korinsky <kirill@korins.ky>
Subject: Re: relayctl: rename "empty" to "unavailable" in table status
To: Rafael Sadowski <rafael@sizeofvoid.org>
Cc: tech@openbsd.org
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2026 12:27:53 +0200

On Sat, 29 Aug 2026 11:43:51 +0200,
Rafael Sadowski <rafael@sizeofvoid.org> wrote:
> 
> relayctl: rename "empty" to "unavailable" in table status
> 
> The word empty suggested the table has no hosts configured. It really means
> the table has no hosts currently up, so unavailable describes the state more
> clearly.
> 
> OK?
>

Reads OK kirill@ and make sense.

But I sugest wait a bit, maybe someone will bring some reason to not do it.

> Index: relayctl.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/relayctl/relayctl.c,v
> diff -u -p -r1.67 relayctl.c
> --- relayctl.c	29 Aug 2026 09:36:49 -0000	1.67
> +++ relayctl.c	29 Aug 2026 09:42:47 -0000
> @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ print_table_status(int up, int fl)
>  	if (fl & F_DISABLE) {
>  		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, "disabled");
>  	} else if (!up) {
> -		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, "empty");
> +		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, "unavailable");
>  	} else if (verbose)
>  		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, "active (%d hosts)", up);
>  	else
> 

-- 
wbr, Kirill