Download raw body.
net lock kernel lock order
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 03:24:44PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 03:05:44PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 01:26:15PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We have code that takes kernel lock just before net lock. As net
> > > lock is a rwlock that releases kernel lock while sleeping, there
> > > is never deadlock due to lock ordering.
> > >
> > > The order kernel lock -> net lock is suboptimal. If net lock is
> > > held by another thread the following happens:
> > >
> > > take kernel lock -> try net lock -> release kernel lock -> sleep
> > > -> take net lock -> take kernel lock
> >
> > this is incorrect. the kernel lock is aquired before the rwlock in a sleep
> > call.
>
> Yes. The kernel lock dance is done in mi_switch(). So the correct
> old sequence is:
>
> take kernel lock -> try net lock -> release kernel lock -> sleep
> -> take kernel lock -> take net lock
>
> But that does not change my argument that the sequence with my diff
> is cheaper.
But is this lock reversal safe? Is there no NET_LOCK somewhere in an
interrupt handler that could run while KERNEL_LOCK is held?
> > > If we change the order we get a less expensive sequence:
> > >
> > > try net lock -> sleep -> take net lock -> take kernel lock
> > >
> > > ok?
> > >
> > > bluhm
> > >
> > > Index: net/if.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/net/if.c,v
> > > diff -u -p -r1.714 if.c
> > > --- net/if.c 29 Dec 2023 11:43:04 -0000 1.714
> > > +++ net/if.c 5 Jan 2024 12:08:01 -0000
> > > @@ -1774,16 +1774,16 @@ if_linkstate_task(void *xifidx)
> > > unsigned int ifidx = (unsigned long)xifidx;
> > > struct ifnet *ifp;
> > >
> > > - KERNEL_LOCK();
> > > NET_LOCK();
> > > + KERNEL_LOCK();
> > >
> > > ifp = if_get(ifidx);
> > > if (ifp != NULL)
> > > if_linkstate(ifp);
> > > if_put(ifp);
> > >
> > > - NET_UNLOCK();
> > > KERNEL_UNLOCK();
> > > + NET_UNLOCK();
> > > }
> > >
> > > void
> > > Index: netinet/in.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/netinet/in.c,v
> > > diff -u -p -r1.185 in.c
> > > --- netinet/in.c 28 Jun 2023 11:49:49 -0000 1.185
> > > +++ netinet/in.c 5 Jan 2024 12:10:07 -0000
> > > @@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ in_ioctl(u_long cmd, caddr_t data, struc
> > > return (error);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - KERNEL_LOCK();
> > > NET_LOCK();
> > > + KERNEL_LOCK();
> > >
> > > TAILQ_FOREACH(ifa, &ifp->if_addrlist, ifa_list) {
> > > if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET)
> > > @@ -331,8 +331,8 @@ in_ioctl(u_long cmd, caddr_t data, struc
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > err:
> > > - NET_UNLOCK();
> > > KERNEL_UNLOCK();
> > > + NET_UNLOCK();
> > > return (error);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -353,8 +353,8 @@ in_ioctl_set_ifaddr(u_long cmd, caddr_t
> > > if (error)
> > > return (error);
> > >
> > > - KERNEL_LOCK();
> > > NET_LOCK();
> > > + KERNEL_LOCK();
> > >
> > > TAILQ_FOREACH(ifa, &ifp->if_addrlist, ifa_list) {
> > > if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET)
> > > @@ -387,8 +387,8 @@ in_ioctl_set_ifaddr(u_long cmd, caddr_t
> > > if (!error)
> > > if_addrhooks_run(ifp);
> > >
> > > - NET_UNLOCK();
> > > KERNEL_UNLOCK();
> > > + NET_UNLOCK();
> > > return error;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -409,8 +409,8 @@ in_ioctl_change_ifaddr(u_long cmd, caddr
> > > return (error);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - KERNEL_LOCK();
> > > NET_LOCK();
> > > + KERNEL_LOCK();
> > >
> > > TAILQ_FOREACH(ifa, &ifp->if_addrlist, ifa_list) {
> > > if (ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET)
> > > @@ -527,8 +527,8 @@ in_ioctl_change_ifaddr(u_long cmd, caddr
> > > panic("%s: invalid ioctl %lu", __func__, cmd);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - NET_UNLOCK();
> > > KERNEL_UNLOCK();
> > > + NET_UNLOCK();
> > > return (error);
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > :wq Claudio
>
--
:wq Claudio
net lock kernel lock order