"The handful of references to -susv2 in
lib/libpthread could be replaced with references to ISO 1003.1?"

Wouldn't it be ISO 9945? (IEEE 1003 I think that you're thinking of)

-Katie
________________________________
From: owner-tech@openbsd.org <owner-tech@openbsd.org> on behalf of Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Sent: 17 June 2024 10:59
To: Job Snijders <job@openbsd.org>
Cc: deraadt@openbsd.org <deraadt@openbsd.org>; schwarze@usta.de <schwarze@usta.de>; jmc@kerhand.co.uk <jmc@kerhand.co.uk>; tech@openbsd.org <tech@openbsd.org>
Subject: Re: mandoc: add POSIX 2024

Attention : courriel externe | external email

> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:45:06 +0000
> From: Job Snijders <job@openbsd.org>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 05:06:38PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Well we can't be Unix, right, because we don't pay anyone so
> > how does SUS even apply?  Best way to make it irrelevant is to
> > not refer to it.
>
> It seems -susv1, -susv3, and -susv4 are not used in man pages in base at
> all (other than mdoc). The handful of references to -susv2 in
> lib/libpthread could be replaced with references to ISO 1003.1?

Almost certainly not.  POSIX was only a subset of SUS.  The two were
merged in v6 with the X/Open System Interfaces becoming an extension
to POSIX.  Some of those interfaces became standard POSIX interfaces
in later revisions.